Ramos v. The State of Texas
Ramos v. The State of Texas
Trial Court Opinion
Southem District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT September 24, □□□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk BROWNSVILLE DIVISION GILBERTO RAMOS, JR., § “Plaintiff,” § § v. § Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-00141 § ROLANDO TRUJILLO, SR., in his official § capacity, and THE CITY OF § BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS, § “Defendants.” § ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s “Report and Recommendation” (Dkt. No. 29) (“R&R”). The R&R recommends that the Court grant “Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss” (Dkt. No. 28) (“MTD”) and dismiss Plaintiff's “Complaint” (Dkt. No. 1) and “Amended Complaint” (Dkt. No. 17). Objections to the R&R were due September 17, 2025. No objections were filed. If there have been no objections to the magistrate’s ruling, the Court reviews the magistrate judge’s conclusions for clear error. See Guillory v. PPG Indus.,
434 F.3d 303, 308(5th Cir. 2005). Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R (Dkt. No. 29) is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) and Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 17) are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby ORDERED to close this case.
Signed on this 24"" day of September 2025.
oe Olvera Urhited States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown