Bumboshkina v. Warden, Prairieland Detention Center

District Court, N.D. Texas

Bumboshkina v. Warden, Prairieland Detention Center

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION DARIA BUMBOSHKINA, § A# _____4022, § Petitioner, § § v. § No. 3:25-CV-1945-B-BW § WARDEN, Prairieland Detention § Center, § Respondent. § ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

, received on June 26, 2025 (Dkt. No. 1), will be DISMISSED without prejudice as moot by separate judgment. A certificate of appealability (COA) is not required to appeal the denial of relief under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

. See Padilla v. United States,

416 F. 424

, 425 (5th Cir. 2005). If the petitioner files a notice of appeal, she must pay the $605.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account. SO ORDERED this 25" day of September, 2025.

JANLJ. BOYIF. URMTED ST S DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown