Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. Texas

Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT CouRT —-SPEEMber 30, 2025 WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION ay. NM JENNIFER NICOLE MOORE, § pee Plaintiff, : v. : NO. SA-24-CV-00766-OLG FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner ; of the Social Security Administration, § Defendant. : ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has considered United States Magistrate Judge Henry J. Bemporad’s Report and Recommendation (R&R), filed July 24, 2025, concerning Plaintiff's appeal from the administrative denial of her application for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits. (See R&R, Dkt. No. 14.) A party who wishes to object to a Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations must serve and file specific written objections within 14 days. FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Plaintiff, through counsel, was electronically served with a copy of the R&R on July 24, 2025, and timely filed objections on August 7, 2025 (see Dkt. No. 16). When a party objects to an R&R, the Court must make a de novo determination as to “any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); see United States. v. Wilson,

864 F.2d 1219, 1221

(Sth Cir. 1989), cert. denied,

492 U.S. 918

(1989). Objections must be specific; frivolous, conclusory, or general objections need not be considered by the district court. Battle v. U.S. Parole Comm’n,

834 F.2d 419, 421

(Sth Cir. 1987) (quoting Nettles v. Wainwright,

677 F.2d 404

, 410 n.8 (Sth Cir. 1982), overruled on other grounds by Douglass v. U.S. Auto. Ass’n,

79 F.3d 1415

(Sth Cir. 1996)). Any portions of the

Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendations that were not objected to are reviewed for clear error, Wilson,

864 F.2d at 1221

. Upon review, the Court finds that Judge Bemporad’s R&R is in all things correct and, thus, that Plaintiff’s objections should be and hereby are OVERRULED. The Court therefore ADOPTS Judge Bemporad’s R&R (Dkt. No. 14) and, for the reasons set forth therein, the Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits is AFFIRMED. This case is CLOSED. It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED this 770 day of September, 2025. Oar ORLANDO L. GARCIA United States District Judge

Reference

Full Case Name
Jennifer Nicole Moore v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Status
Unknown