Christopher Dale Havens v. Sheriff’s Department of Aransas County, et al.
Christopher Dale Havens v. Sheriff’s Department of Aransas County, et al.
Trial Court Opinion
| Southern District of Texas | ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT □□ 2088 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION | CHRISTOPHER DALE HAVENS, § Plaintiff, : ve ; CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00283 □□ SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT OF ARANSAS : COUNTY, ef al., . § Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 26). The M&R recommends that the Court: e Dismiss Plaintiff's official capacity claims without prejudice: .e Dismiss Plaintiffs’ remaining claims with prejudice as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and e Impose a “strike” under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and instruct the Clerk to send notice of this dismissal tothe Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas at [email protected].
Id. at 57. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate. Judge’s M&R. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b); cee Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly scones or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,
864 F.2d 1219, 1221(5th Cir. 1989) (per sia Powell v. Litton Loan ! Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700,
2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (SD. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted). .
Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 26). Accordingly, the Court: e DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiffs official capacity claims; e DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiff's remaining claims as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and e IMPOSES a “strike” under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and instructs the Clerk to send notice of this dismissal to the Manager of the Thre Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas at [email protected]. gor. The Court will enter a final judgment separately. SO ORDERED. \ /
DAVIBSS.MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas October 1942025
Reference
- Status
- Unknown