FILED October 20, 2025 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT —_ WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BY. NM SAN ANTONIO DIVISION Deputy MARI QASIMI and EDRIS AKRAMI, = § Plaintiffs, : v. ; NO. SA-24-CV-01164-OLG MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney : General of the United States, ef a/., § Defendants. : ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has considered United States Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer’s Report and Recommendation (R&R), filed September 2, 2025, concerning pro se Plaintiffs’ Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (See R&R, Dkt. No. 10.) Any party who desires to object to a Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations must serve and file specific written objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of the findings and recommendations. Fi:D. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). A copy of the R&R was sent via certified mail on September 2, 2025 (see Dkt. No. 11) and returned as undeliverable on October 9, 2025 (see Dkt. No. 12). See FED. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C) (providing that service may be made by mail “to the person’s last known address—in which event service is complete upon mailing”). To date, no objections have been filed. Because no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendations, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989); cf

(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which an objection is made.”) After such review, the Court finds that the R&R is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Farrer’s R&R (Dkt. No. 10) and, for the reasons set forth therein, Plaintiffs’ Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. See FED. R. CIv. P. 41(b). This case is CLOSED. Itisso ORDERED.

SIGNED this i day of October 2025. Oa. ORLANDO L. GARCIA United States District Judge