IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION DONALD J. CURRY §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:25-cv-261 PACK UNIT ADMINISTRATION § MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE Plaintiff Donald J. Curry, an inmate confined at the Pack Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights complaint pursuant to

against the Pack Unit Administration. The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to

and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case. Factual Background Plaintiff complains that the Defendant is using an old policy in order to harass and sexually discriminate against prisoners concerning the “length of religious hair.” (Doc. #1.) Analysis The Civil Rights Act,

, et seq., under which this case is brought, does not contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by

. Jones v. Bales,

(N.D. Ga. 1972), aff'd per curium,

(5th Cir. 1973). When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship,

provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in which the claim arose. Here, Plaintiff complains of incidents which occurred at the Pack Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice located in Navasota, Grimes County, Texas. When public officials are parties to an action in their official capacities, they reside for venue purposes in the county where they perform their official duties, which in this case is Grimes County. Holloway v. Gunnell,

(Sth Cir. 1982); Lowrey v. Estelle,

(Sth Cir. 1976). Pursuant to

, Grimes County is located in the Houston Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Accordingly, venue for such claims is not proper in the Eastern District of Texas. When venue is not proper, the court “shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.”

(a). This action should be transferred to the Southern District of Texas. An appropriate order so providing will be entered by the undersigned.

SIGNED this the 25th day of September, 2025. CSE Christine Stetson UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE