Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT □□ 2028 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION JOHN MICHAEL CAMPOS, § § Petitioner, § V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00188 ERIC GUERRERO, Respondent. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 11). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss Petitioner’s habeas petition and deny a certificate of appealability. /d. at 1. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell vy. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 11). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Petitioner’s habeas petition, (D.E. 1), as second or successive and DENIES a Certificate of Appealability. The Court will enter a final judgment separately.

1/2

DA > MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas OctoberZ2 742025

2/2.