UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT November 04, 2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

BARBARA MEADOR, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00064 § KILOLO KIJAKAZI, § § Defendant. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 9). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice for want of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Id. at 2. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 9). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1 / 2 41(b). (D.E. 1). The Court will enter a final judgment separately. SO ORDERED.

DAVISAMORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Signed: Victoria, Texas November 4, 2025

2/2