□ Southern District of Texas , ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT vevemner □□ □□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION CURTIS WOOD, § Petitioner, Vv. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00096 WARDEN FCI THREE RIVERS, . Respondent. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (““M&R”). (D.E. 11). The M&R recommends that the Court grant Respondent’s motion for summary judgment and dismiss Petitioner’s

petition. Jd. at 2. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United □

States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per. curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 11). Accordingly, the Court □ GRANTS Respondent’s motion for summary: judgment, (D.E. 9), and DISMISSES without prejudice Petitioner’s § 2241 petition. (D.E. 1). ,

1/2

The Court will enter a final judgment separately. SO ORDERED. .

DAV . MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas November44 2025

2/2