Southern District of Texas ENTERED November 13, 2025 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION □ MATTHEW OTERO, § Plaintiff, □□

v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00246 CITY OF ROCKPORT, et al., Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 11). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and preliminary injunction, (D.E. 5); (D.E. 11, p. 1). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate □ Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the MER is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 11). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion for a TRO and preliminary injunction. (D.E. 5). -

1/2

SO ORDERED. .

DAVI ORALES UNITED SFATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas November / 3445025

2/2