Southern District of Texas ENTERED November 17, 2025 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION KRISTOPHER BAZAN, § Plaintiff,

v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00282 MARTIN O’MALLEY, et ai., Defendants. . ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 20). The M&R recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees. Jd. at 2. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erronéous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 20). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees. (D.E. 19). SO ORDERED.

DAVID S-MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas November 1942025