Southern District of Texas ENTERED November 20, 2025 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION JOHN MICHAEL DAVIS, § Plaintiff, : v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:25-CV-00041 VICTORIA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., § Defendants. : ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 6). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss without prejudice Plaintiff’s claims for failure to prosecute. Id. at 2. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell y. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings ~ of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 6). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff s claim for failure to prosecute. The Court will enter a final judgment separately. . 41/2

SO ORDERED. ( DAVID-SSMORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas November [69025

2/2