Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT eee □ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION DANNY ALLEN, § § Plaintiff, § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00225 MICHAEI. CROW, e/ ai., : Defendants, ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R”). (D.E. 62). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Defendant Crow’s motion to dismiss with on the issue of standing, but grant the motion to dismiss with prejudice with respect to the merits of Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim against Defendant Crow in his individual capacity. fd. at 17. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); Fep. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 62), Accordingly, the Court

1/2

DENIES Defendant’s motion on the issue of standing, but GRANTS Defendant’s motion on the merits and DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment against Defendant Crow in his individual capacity. (D.E. 46). The only remaining claims are those against the unidentified and unserved Lt. Jane Doe defendant. SO ORDERED.

DA . MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas December G* 2025