Rosa Mares, et al. v. National Treasury Employees Union, Chapter 10 and Roberto...

. □ Southern District of Texas * ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT January 14, 2026 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk BROWNSVILLE DIVISION ROSA MARES, ef al., § “Plaintiffs,” § § .

. § Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-00069 NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES § UNION, CHAPTER 10 and ROBERTO § BRISENO, § “Defendants.” § ORDER Before the Court are “Plaintiffs’ First Amended Original Complaint” (Dkt. No. 17) (“Complaint”), “Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt. No. 18) (“MTD”), “Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt. No. 19) (“Response”), “Defendants’ Reply in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt.

No. 20) (“Reply”), “Plaintiffs’ Sur-Reply to Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt. No. 22) (“Surreply”), and the Magistrate Judge’s “Report and Recommendations” (Dkt. No. 25) (“R&R”).

The R&R recommends this Court grant the MTD and dismiss the Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 25 at 14.

The R&R was published December 22, 2025. Dkt. No. 25. Objections to the R&R were due January 5, 2026. No objections have been filed. The Court thus reviews the R&R’s conclusions for plain error. See Guillory v. PPG Indus., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (Sth Cir. 2005).

Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the R&R (Dkt. No. 25). The MTD (Dkt. No. 18) is GRANTED, and the Complaint (Dkt. No. 17) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby ORDERED to.close this case.

Signed on this 14" day of January, 2026. ing Olvera Unitéd States District Judge