Matthew Andrew Garces v. Nick Doe et al.

FILED January 08, 2026 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Whe PRN DISIRICL OF TEXAS WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION py NM DEPUTY MATTHEW ANDREW GARCES, § Plaintiff, : Vv. : CIVIL NO. SA-25-CV-578-OLG NICK DOE et ail., ; Defendants. ; ORDER The Court has considered United States Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer’s Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) (Dkt. No. 14), filed on December 3, 2025. No party filed objections to the Report.

When no party objects to a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review of the entire record. See U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendation to which objection is made.”); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Rather, the Court need only review the magistrate judge’s recommendation to determine whether it is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989).

The Court has reviewed the Report and is of the opinion that it is correct. Accordingly, the Report (Dkt. No. 14) is ACCEPTED and, for the reasons set forth therein, Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief (Dkt. No. 13) is STRICKEN from the record, and any live claims asserted by Plaintiff in this matter are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is CLOSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this S day of January, 2026.

ORLANDO L. GARCIA United States District Judge