David Reyes Medrano v. Jose Andrade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT April 24, 2026 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk MCALLEN DIVISION DAVID REYES MEDRANO, § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § Civil Case No. 7:25-CV-00450 § JOSE ANDRADE, § § Defendant. § ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pending before the Court is the March 6, 2026, Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) prepared by Magistrate Judge Juan F. Alanis. (Dkt.

No. 6). Judge Alanis made findings and conclusions and recommended that Plaintiff’s Complaint, (Dkt. No. 2), be dismissed, (Dkt. No. 6).

The Parties were provided proper notice and the opportunity to object to the M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No party filed an objection. As a result, review is straightforward: plain error. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005). No plain error appears.

Accordingly, the Court accepts the M&R and adopts it as the opinion of the Court.

It is therefore ordered that: (1) Judge Alanis’s M&R, (Dkt. No. 6), is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and (2) Plaintiff’s Complaint, (Dkt. No. 2), is DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

It is SO ORDERED.

Signed on April 23, 2026.

DREW B. TIPTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE