Leonard Maurice Solomon v. Eric Guerrero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT April 27, 2026 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

LEONARD MAURICE SOLOMON, § § Petitioner, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00238 § ERIC GUERRERO, § § Respondent. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION On March 27, 2026, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his “Memorandum and Recommendation” (D.E. 20), recommending that Respondent’s motion to dismiss (D.E. 12) be granted and that this action be dismissed as barred by limitations. The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Special Order No. C-2023-1. No objections have been timely filed.

When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).

Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 20), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (D.E. 12) and DISMISSES this action as time barred. In the event that Petitioner requests a certificate of appealability, that request is DENIED.

ORDERED on April 27, 2026.

Lela GONZAIGS RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2/2