Burton v. Varnell

Texas Supreme Court
Burton v. Varnell, 1 Tex. 635 (Tex. 1846)
Lipscomb

Burton v. Varnell

Opinion of the Court

Lipscomb, J.

There has been no brief filed by the plaintiff in error. From the record it appears that suit -was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff on a note of hand; that after answer had been filed there was a judgment for the plaintiff below, with a stay of execution — nine months. We believe that according to a sound rule of construction, we are bound to conclude that the *(446)answer bad been waived, and the judgment entered by consent, and that it is in effect a judgment by confession. No proceeding being had until after the expiration of the nine months is a strong circumstance in support of this conclusion. The judgment must be affirmed with damages.

Reference

Full Case Name
John J. Burton v. Willam M. Varnell
Status
Published