Ables v. Pearle
Texas Supreme Court
Ables v. Pearle, 10 Tex. 285 (Tex. 1853)
Lipscomb
Ables v. Pearle
Opinion of the Court
Tiie only error assigned that it is necessary to notice is, that the court erred in dismissing the certiorari after a Term had intervened, on the authority of Dunn v. O’Brien, (5 Tex. R., 570,) and Steinlein v. Dial, decided at the present Term. The motion to dismiss or quash the writ of certiorari could not bo made after the return Term. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court.
Beversed and remanded.
Note. 55. — Steinlein v. Dial, ante 268.
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published