Latimer v. Bagnell
Latimer v. Bagnell
Opinion of the Court
This suit was brought by the defendant in error against one Dean, before a Justice of the Peace, and a judgment was rendered by the Justice of the Peace in favor of Bagnell. The defendant in the Justice’s Court petitioned for and obtained a certiorari, to take the case into the District Court, and Latimer, plaintiff in error, was his security. When
The entry of dismissal and judgment does not appear to have been made on the application of the parties, nor do they appear to have been present. Under the circumstances, there is no doubt of the correctness of the order ; and, in such cases, the plaintiff would be the party liable for costs. But there is an error in the judgment, in misconceiving the proper position of the parties, and rendering it agaainst the real defendants. The relative position of the parties was not changed by bringing the case into the District Court, as to plaintiff and defendant ; and no objection being made to the certiorari, the plaintiff before the Justice was still plaintiff, and bound to prosecute his case de novo. The dismissal under the circumstances presented, would be at the cost of the plaintiff in the original suit, in the absence of all evidence of an agreement to the contrary. The judgment must therefore be reversed, and rendered against Bagnell, and certified to the Court below.
Reversed and reformed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Albert H. Latimer v. Milas Bagnell
- Status
- Published