Witten v. Poindexter
Texas Supreme Court
Witten v. Poindexter, 25 Tex. 378 (Tex. 1860)
Roberts
Witten v. Poindexter
Opinion of the Court
—The defect in the cause of action, as stated in the petition, is, that no particular land was identified, for which a judgment could have been rendered for plaintiff below, upon a recovery by him. The statement of facts appearing in the transcript has no approval by the district judge who tried the cause. There is', therefore, no ground of reversal presented in the record of the case.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Where the alleged error rested upon facts said to be proven, and it did not appear that the statement of facts was submitted to the judge for his “ approval and signature,” and that he signed it, the judgment was affirmed. (Paschal’s Dig., Art. 1490, Note 582.)