McNeill v. Hallmark
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Mann v. Brown (Tex. App. 1918)
- Young v. City of Colorado (Tex. App. 1915)
- Kerr v. Murphy (S.D. 1905)
- Ex parte Howard-Harrison Iron Co. (Ala. 1898)
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Dowe (Tex. 1888)
- McAnear v. Epperson (Tex. 1881)
- Williams v. Ball (Tex. 1879)
- Pait v. McCutchen (Tex. 1875)
- Garner v. Smith (Tex. 1874)
- Long v. Smith (Tex. 1873)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—The matter in controversy in this case is less than $100. The issuing of the writ and the service thereof on the defendant gave the justice of the peace, who •tried the cause, jurisdiction.
That an injunction was not the remedy, is believed to have been settled by this court in the case of Fitzhugh v. Orton, 12 Tex., 5; Smith v. Ryan, 20 Id., 664; Rotzein v. Cox, 22 Tex., 65. The judgment is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.