Anderson v. State
Anderson v. State
Opinion of the Court
— We are of opinion that there is no error in the record, and that the judgment must be affirmed.
The indictment is for murder; verdict, murder in the second degree.
The charge of the court is elaborate, and, taken as a whole, quite accurate. In making the distinction between murder of the first and second degree this paragraph occurs:
“If you believe the defendant killed the deceased in a sudden and unexpected fight without previous malice, and with no time for deliberation, and no previously-formed design, then he will be guilty of murder in the second degree.”
This is objected to, as calculated to mislead the jury, and preclude them from finding a verdict of manslaughter. Taken in connection with the facts, we do not so regard it. Malice is an essential ingredient of murder, and, whenever found to exist, there can be no such offense as manslaughter. The terms, “without previous malice” and “no previously-formed design,” are used above to negative the idea of express malice, and to direct the mind of the jury to implied
This view is more evident from the succeeding paragraph of the charge, which lays down the law of manslaughter with great liberality to the prisoner.
Judgment aeeirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Calvin Anderson v. State
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Where the accused had provoked a fight, in which he got worsted at fisticuffs, and on rising from the ground snatched his pistol and shot his antagonist, who was unarmed, it was not error to charge the jury that, if they believed the defendant killed the deceased in a sudden and unexpected fight, without previous malice, and with no time for deliberation, and no previously-formed design, he is guilty of murder in the second degree. (Paschal’s Dig., Art. 2267, Note 672.) If such a charge be subject to criticism, it is yet correct when taken in connection with a clear and unchallenged charge which defined all the degrees of homicide.