Anderson v. Lewis
Anderson v. Lewis
Opinion of the Court
—The petition is in the usual form of debt, and alleges that defendants in error caused the plaintiff’s arrest by the military authorities of the Confederate States, and whilst thus in camp forced him, by the power of the military authority of the Confederacy, to receive “ Confederate money” in payment of debts due by promissory notes. The pet'tion was held insufficient on demurrer.
Reversed and remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- M. Anderson v. Lewis & Spence M. Anderson v. Lewis & Killough M. Anderson v. Hearne & Hearne
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- The 5th section of the ordinance of the convention of 1866 did not extend to • the justification of those who, hy military arrests, had forced their creditors - to receive the Confederate currency in payment. (Paschal’s Dig., p. 950, ord. XI, sec. 5.) This ordinance was designed to protect officers, state and Confederate, and persons acting under them, in the performance of “military or civil authority.”