Tait v. Matthews

Texas Supreme Court
Tait v. Matthews, 33 Tex. 112 (Tex. 1870)
Walker

Tait v. Matthews

Opinion of the Court

Walker, J.

Any errors which might have been committed by the court prior to the rendition of a judgment by the consent of the parties are waived, and will not now be noticed by this court. The principles involved in most of the exceptions have been settled by *113ibis court in the case of Buffalo Bayou, Brazos and Colorado Bail-road Company v. Gfeorge A. Ferris, 26 Texas, 588.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed with damages. .

Affirmed. •

Reference

Full Case Name
C. W. Tait v. M. B. Matthews
Cited By
6 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
1. A judgment by consent of parties waives all errors committed before its rendition, and they will not be noticed by this.court. 2. The case of The Buffalo Bayou, Brazos and Colorado Railroad Company v. Ferris, 26 Texas,'588, cited with approval.