Tait v. Matthews
Texas Supreme Court
Tait v. Matthews, 33 Tex. 112 (Tex. 1870)
Walker
Tait v. Matthews
Opinion of the Court
Any errors which might have been committed by the court prior to the rendition of a judgment by the consent of the parties are waived, and will not now be noticed by this court. The principles involved in most of the exceptions have been settled by
The judgment of the district court is affirmed with damages. .
Affirmed. •
Reference
- Full Case Name
- C. W. Tait v. M. B. Matthews
- Cited By
- 6 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- 1. A judgment by consent of parties waives all errors committed before its rendition, and they will not be noticed by this.court. 2. The case of The Buffalo Bayou, Brazos and Colorado Railroad Company v. Ferris, 26 Texas,'588, cited with approval.