Wright v. McKenney
Wright v. McKenney
Opinion of the Court
This is a proceeding against a sheriff for not returning execution according to law.
The law requires notice of the motion to .be served upon the sheriff at least three days before the motion can be made. This record does show that some sort of notice was served upon the defendants, but it does not appear whether it was notice of the motion or the motion itself.
The motion takes the place of the petition in this class of cases. The proceeding is summary and quasi criminal, and a strict compliance with the law should be required. The motion would be bad on demurrer; it does not sufficiently set forth the liability of the securities on the sheriff’s bond. Conclusions of law are not to be plead, but the facts from which such conclusions may or may not be derived. The' bond should be Set out, or at least so much of it as will enable the court to determine whether the sureties are liable upon it or not. The liability of sureties is strict matter of law, to be determined by the nature of their undertaking. In this case the court had nothing before it from which this question could be legally determined. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- A. J. Wright and others v. E. A. McKenney
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- I. In proceeding by motion' against a sheriff and his sureties, the motion, stands in the place of a.potition. The proceeding is summary and quasi criminal, and the party plaintiff should be held to a strict compliance with the law. „ ■_ 2. A motion against a sheriff and the sureties on his bond failed to set out the bond, but merely averred that the persons designated as the sureties were such, and were liable as such. Held, that the motion is insufficient. 3. Conclusions of law should not be pleaded, but the facts from which such conclusions may or may not be deduced. 4. The liability of sureties is determinable by the nature of their undertaking ; and a proceeding against sureties should at least disclose sufficient of their undertaking to enable the court to judge of its nature.