State v. Anderson
State v. Anderson
34 Tex. 611
State v. Anderson
Opinion of the Court
The indictment in this-ease is sufficient to sustain the charge. The description of the animal taken Up and used, is more definite and certain than is usual in such cases; And the allegation that the animal was an estray is a sufficient allegation that the ownership was unknown. The court erred in sustaining the motion to quash the indictment. The judgment is reversed -and the ease remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.