Barker v. State

Texas Supreme Court
Barker v. State, 36 Tex. 201 (Tex. 1872)
Walker

Barker v. State

Opinion of the Court

Walker, J.

There is no assignment of errors in this case, nor are we able to discover upon the record any error which would authorize us in reversing the judgment.

*202The appellants were indicted for the larceny of dry goods and ready-made clothing. Several others were charged in the same indictment, and one Saunders, who appears to have been implicated in the larceny, gave evidence for the State.

There was certainly other evidence tending to show the guilt of appellants, and it was not error in the court to call the attention of the jury to this fact.

There is no comment upon the weight of the evidence, nor is the charge of the court at all unfavorable to the appellants.

The verdict is responsive to the evidence. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
J. C. Barker and another v. State
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
Syllabus
It was not error for the court helow to call the attention of the jury to the fact that there was other evidence in a felony case tending to corroborate the evidence of the State, which consisted in the testimony of an accomplice ; but leaving the jury to give the evidence such weight as they saw fit to ascribe to it.