State v. Walker

The court erred in sustaining the motion to quash the indictment. It contained every necessary averment for a valid indictment, as has been repeatedly decided by this court. (See State v. Croft, 15 Texas, 576; State v. Hedrick, 35 Texas, 485; State v. Killough, 32 Texas, 77; State v. Peters, 36 Texas, 325; Martin v. The State, decided at the present term.)

Reversed and remanded.