Guadalupe County v. Wilson County

Texas Supreme Court
Guadalupe County v. Wilson County, 58 Tex. 228 (Tex. 1882)
1882 Tex. LEXIS 238
Stayton

Guadalupe County v. Wilson County

Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

This action was brought by Guadalupe county against Wilson county to establish the true boundary line between the two counties, and to enjoin Wilson county from exercising jurisdiction over certain territory claimed to be a part of Gaudalupe county. A plea to the jurisdiction of the court was interposed, which was overruled by the court, after which a trial was had and a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant.

The plea to the jurisdiction should have been sustained and the cause dismissed, for the question was not one for judicial inquiry. There was a law in force defining the boundaries of Wilson and Guadalupe counties, and the statute provides the mode by which county boundaries may be ascertained. R. S., 686-691.

If the act of March 13, 1874, defining the boundaries of Wilson county, had been unconstitutional for want of a proper title, a suit between the counties could not have been maintained for the sole purpose of having it so declared.

If the act had been unconstitutional, it would have interposed no obstacle to the exercise of jurisdiction by Guadalupe county over the territory which prior to it belonged to that county.

Persons owning property, or living within the disputed territory, by showing a sufficient pecuniary interest, or injury to themselves, *231might, in a matter affecting themselves, have presented a question for judicial inquiry.

[Opinion delivered December 21, 1882.]

It is proper to say that even if the act of March 13, 1874, was invalid, which it is unnecessary for us to consider, the same had been re-enacted in the Revised Statutes prior to the institution of this suit. R. S., 927.

The cause is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Reference

Cited By
8 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
1. County boundary—Jurisdiction.—A suit by one county against another to establish the true boundary line between them, and to enjoin from the exercise of jurisdiction, cannot be maintained. The issue in such a cause presents a political question, and not one for judicial inquiry. 2. Same.—The statutes in force having defined the boundaries of the counties, the statutory mode of ascertaining the locality of the dividing lines on the ground must be pursued. 3. Same.— An unconstitutional act creating a new county from an old one can interpose no obstacle to the exercise of jurisdiction by the mother county over the territory embraced in the new county, but an action cannot be maintained by the old county for the sole purpose of having the act pronounced unconstitutional. 4. Same.—But a citizen injuriously affected by the effort to enforce an unconstitutional act creating a new county, may, in the protection of such interest, invoke the jurisdiction of the courts.