Grimm v. Childress

It follows, of course, that there was no impropriety in the court making the remark to. appellants counsel stated in the bill of exceptions. He did not deny counsel the privilege of making the argument, but merely mentioned to him facts showing that it would be an unnecessary labor and consumption of time, which it would have been, and it was but justice to counsel that he should be so informed. There is no error in the judgment and it is affirmed.

Opinion by