Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Texas /Cases /Texas Supreme Court /

1894

154 Texas Supreme Court opinions from 1894.

  • Western Union Telegraph Co. v. O'Keefe 28 S.W. 945, (Tex. 1894)
  • City of Quanah v. White 28 S.W. 1065, (Tex. 1894)
  • Eckford v. Berry 28 S.W. 937, (Tex. 1894)
  • Byers Bros. v. Wallace 28 S.W. 1056, (Tex. 1894)
  • Mathonican v. Scott & Baldwin 28 S.W. 1063, (Tex. 1894)
  • Steele v. Goodrich and Wallace 28 S.W. 939, (Tex. 1894)
  • Hudson v. P. J. Willis & Co. 28 S.W. 929, (Tex. 1894)
  • Powers v. Schmidt 28 S.W. 1055, (Tex. 1894)
  • Bouldin v. Miller 28 S.W. 940, (Tex. 1894)
  • Olsen v. Homestead Land & Improvement Co. 28 S.W. 944, (Tex. 1894)
  • Hume v. Ware 28 S.W. 935, (Tex. 1894)
  • Huddleston, Administrator v. Kempner 28 S.W. 936, (Tex. 1894)
  • Snyder v. Compton 28 S.W. 1061, (Tex. 1894)
  • Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Smith 28 S.W. 520, (Tex. 1894)
  • City of Austin v. Austin City Cemetery Ass'n 28 S.W. 528, (Tex. 1894)
  • Pitts v. Elsler 28 S.W. 518, (Tex. 1894)
  • Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. Daggett 28 S.W. 525, (Tex. 1894)
  • Dunn v. Price 28 S.W. 681, (Tex. 1894)
  • Saunders v. Ireland 28 S.W. 271, (Tex. 1894)
  • International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sein 28 S.W. 286, (Tex. 1894)
  • International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Neff 28 S.W. 283, (Tex. 1894)
  • Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Gray 28 S.W. 280, (Tex. 1894)
  • International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Wentworth 28 S.W. 277, (Tex. 1894)
  • Bomar v. West 28 S.W. 519, (Tex. 1894)
  • City Bank v. Mechanics National Bank 28 S.W. 277, (Tex. 1894)
  • International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Douglass 28 S.W. 271, (Tex. 1894)
  • Cheeves v. Anders, Administrator 28 S.W. 274, (Tex. 1894)
  • Mexican Central Railway Co. v. Lauricella 28 S.W. 277, (Tex. 1894)
  • Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Thomas 28 S.W. 343, (Tex. 1894)
  • Smith v. Estill 28 S.W. 801, (Tex. 1894)
  • Receiver v. Goodwin 28 S.W. 273, (Tex. 1894)
  • Lake v. Coapland 29 S.W. 39, (Tex. 1894)
  • D. O. McRimmon & Co. v. W. C. Moody & Co. 28 S.W. 279, (Tex. 1894)
  • Legate v. Legate 28 S.W. 281, (Tex. 1894)
  • Wetzel v. L. Simon & Co. 28 S.W. 274, (Tex. 1894)
  • Thompson v. Langdon 28 S.W. 931, (Tex. 1894)
  • Dillingham v. Richards 28 S.W. 272, (Tex. 1894)
  • Cameron v. State 28 S.W. 272, (Tex. 1894)
  • Winston v. Masterson 27 S.W. 768, (Tex. 1894)
  • McKeen v. James 25 S.W. 408, (Tex. 1894)
  • Clark & Plumb v. Gregory, Cooley & Co. 27 S.W. 56, (Tex. 1894)
  • Moran v. Wheeler 27 S.W. 54, (Tex. 1894)
  • McCammant v. Robberts 27 S.W. 86, (Tex. 1894)
  • Oppenheimer v. Robinson 27 S.W. 95, (Tex. 1894)
  • Forsgard v. Ford 27 S.W. 57, (Tex. 1894)
  • Fleming v. the Texas Loan Agency 27 S.W. 126, (Tex. 1894)
  • Mayher v. Manhattan Life Insurance 27 S.W. 124, (Tex. 1894)
  • East Texas Fire Insurance v. Kempner 27 S.W. 122, (Tex. 1894)
  • Odell v. Wharton 27 S.W. 123, (Tex. 1894)
  • Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Black 27 S.W. 118, (Tex. 1894)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑