Texas Supreme Court, 1895

International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Miller

International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Miller
Texas Supreme Court · Decided January 17, 1895 · Galles
29 S.W. 235; 87 Tex. 430; 1895 Tex. LEXIS 362 (South Western Reporter)

Counsel

R.G. Street, for application. — When counsel employed in the case, after the exercise of due diligence, only discovers on the eve of trial that he will not be able to be present on the particular day when the case is expected to be tried, due diligence does not require that other counsel shall be employed, when it is already probably too late to properly instruct new counsel; and in such case the offer of counsel thus unavoidably detained to agree to any subsequent day of the term, or to allow continuance to be charged to his side of the case, is a reasonable one; and if under such circumstances judgment is taken in the absence of counsel, on motion duly filed, accompanied by affidavits showing such diligence, and also a meritorious defense to the action, a new trial should be granted.

International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Miller

Opinion of the Court

GALLES, Chief Justice.

We have carefully examined the application for a writ of error in this case, and are of opinion that the grounds of error therein assigned are not well taken.

In order, however, to prevent a misapprehension which may result from a refusal of the writ of error by this court, we deem it proper to say, that the charge upon the question of exemplary damages which was passed upon by the Court of Civil Appeals is not assigned as error in this court, and therefore is not before us for consideration.

The application is refused.

Application refused.

Delivered January 17, 1895.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.