Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Texas /Cases /Texas Supreme Court /

1909

100 Texas Supreme Court opinions from 1909.

  • Williams v. Detroit Oil & Cotton Co. 123 S.W. 405, (Tex. 1909)
  • Pollock v. Houston & Texas Central Railroad 123 S.W. 408, (Tex. 1909)
  • Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Tuck 123 S.W. 406, (Tex. 1909)
  • Beaumont Traction Co. v. Texarkana & Fort Smith Railway Co. 123 S.W. 124, (Tex. 1909)
  • St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Samuels 123 S.W. 121, (Tex. 1909)
  • Itasca Independent School District v. McElroy 123 S.W. 117, (Tex. 1909)
  • Hess v. Webb 123 S.W. 111, (Tex. 1909)
  • Vansickle v. Watson 123 S.W. 112, (Tex. 1909)
  • Clevenger v. Blount 122 S.W. 529, (Tex. 1909)
  • Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Reynolds 122 S.W. 531, (Tex. 1909)
  • Fort Worth Driving Club v. Fort Worth Fair Ass'n 122 S.W. 254, (Tex. 1909)
  • Byrne v. Robison 122 S.W. 256, (Tex. 1909)
  • Dilley v. Jasper Lumber Co. 122 S.W. 255, (Tex. 1909)
  • Sherman Gas & Electric Co. v. Belden 123 S.W. 119, (Tex. 1909)
  • Haring v. Shelton 122 S.W. 13, (Tex. 1909)
  • Hopkins v. Hopkins 122 S.W. 15, (Tex. 1909)
  • Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Romans 121 S.W. 1104, (Tex. 1909)
  • Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Huber 121 S.W. 1106, (Tex. 1909)
  • Lively v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. 120 S.W. 852, (Tex. 1909)
  • Dallas Consolidated Electric Street Railway Co. v. State 120 S.W. 997, (Tex. 1909)
  • San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. Hodges 120 S.W. 848, (Tex. 1909)
  • Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. Keeling 120 S.W. 847, (Tex. 1909)
  • City of Austin v. Nalle 120 S.W. 996, (Tex. 1909)
  • Hidalgo County Drainage District v. Davidson 120 S.W. 849, (Tex. 1909)
  • Moss & Raley v. Wren 113 S.W. 739, (Tex. 1909)
  • McFerrin v. Templeman 120 S.W. 167, (Tex. 1909)
  • Bustin v. J.T. Robison, Commissioner 119 S.W. 1140, (Tex. 1909)
  • Leaverton v. Robison 120 S.W. 169, (Tex. 1909)
  • Myers v. Frey 119 S.W. 1142, (Tex. 1909)
  • Rhodes v. Maret 119 S.W. 1139, (Tex. 1909)
  • Waterman v. Charlton 120 S.W. 171, (Tex. 1909)
  • Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. Alexander 119 S.W. 1135, (Tex. 1909)
  • Bogel v. Robison 119 S.W. 1144, (Tex. 1909)
  • Escavaille v. Stephens 119 S.W. 842, (Tex. 1909)
  • Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Briscoe 119 S.W. 844, (Tex. 1909)
  • Hoencke v. Lomax 119 S.W. 842, (Tex. 1909)
  • Buchanan v. Burnett and Wife 119 S.W. 1141, (Tex. 1909)
  • Wm. D. Cleveland & Sons v. Smith 119 S.W. 843, (Tex. 1909)
  • Pence v. Robison 119 S.W. 1145, (Tex. 1909)
  • Giraud v. Robison 119 S.W. 1145, (Tex. 1909)
  • Bowman v. Saigling 119 S.W. 295, (Tex. 1909)
  • Pecos & North Texas Railway Co. v. Canyon Coal Co. 119 S.W. 294, (Tex. 1909)
  • Merrill v. Bradley 119 S.W. 297, (Tex. 1909)
  • Underwood v. King 119 S.W. 298, (Tex. 1909)
  • Dupree v. State 119 S.W. 301, (Tex. 1909)
  • Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. McCoy 119 S.W. 88, (Tex. 1909)
  • Hutcheson v. International & Great Northern Railroad 119 S.W. 85, (Tex. 1909)
  • Speer & Goodnight v. Sykes 119 S.W. 86, (Tex. 1909)
  • Potter v. Robison 119 S.W. 90, (Tex. 1909)
  • Barnes v. Williams 119 S.W. 89, (Tex. 1909)
« Prev 1 2 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑