Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Texas /Cases /Texas Supreme Court /

1912

107 Texas Supreme Court opinions from 1912.

  • Ralls v. Parrish 147 S.W. 564, (Tex. 1912)
  • Wadsworth v. Vineyard 147 S.W. 560, (Tex. 1912)
  • Paschall v. Brown 147 S.W. 561, (Tex. 1912)
  • Kincheloe Irrigating Co. v. Hahn Bros. & Co. 146 S.W. 1187, (Tex. 1912)
  • Grayson County Bank v. Wandelohr 146 S.W. 1186, (Tex. 1912)
  • Hovey v. Shepherd 147 S.W. 224, (Tex. 1912)
  • Simmons v. Lightfoot, Atty.-Gen. 146 S.W. 871, (Tex. 1912)
  • Seiter v. Smith 147 S.W. 226, (Tex. 1912)
  • Nash Hardware Co. v. Morris 146 S.W. 874, (Tex. 1912)
  • Crabb v. Celeste Independent School District 146 S.W. 528, (Tex. 1912)
  • Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Wood-Hagenbarth Cattle Co. 146 S.W. 538, (Tex. 1912)
  • Robinson & Martin v. Houston & Texas Central Railroad 146 S.W. 537, (Tex. 1912)
  • Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. Boone 146 S.W. 533, (Tex. 1912)
  • Ericson v. Supreme Ruling, Fraternal Mystic Circle 146 S.W. 160, (Tex. 1912)
  • Raywood Rice, Canal & Milling Co. v. Erp 146 S.W. 155, (Tex. 1912)
  • Gathright v. Pacific Express Co. 145 S.W. 1185, (Tex. 1912)
  • J. Rosenbaum Grain Co. v. Mitchell 145 S.W. 1188, (Tex. 1912)
  • McCord v. Sprinkel 141 S.W. 945, (Tex. 1912)
  • J. Rosenbaum Grain Co. v. Mitchell 105 Tex. 160, (Tex. 1912)
  • McCord v. Sprinkel 145 S.W. 903, (Tex. 1912)
  • Barnes v. Patrick 146 S.W. 154, (Tex. 1912)
  • San Antonio Gas & Electric Co. v. Ocon 146 S.W. 162, (Tex. 1912)
  • St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Horne 145 S.W. 1186, (Tex. 1912)
  • Commerce Cotton Oil Co. v. Camp 130 S.W. 902, (Tex. 1912)
  • Commerce Cotton Oil Co. v. Camp 145 S.W. 902, (Tex. 1912)
  • Railroad Commission v. Galveston Chamber of Commerce 145 S.W. 573, (Tex. 1912)
  • Burnett v. Atteberry 145 S.W. 582, (Tex. 1912)
  • State of Texas v. Desilva 145 S.W. 330, (Tex. 1912)
  • Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Lucas 144 S.W. 1126, (Tex. 1912)
  • Lanham v. Lanham 145 S.W. 336, (Tex. 1912)
  • Stamford Compress Co. v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank 144 S.W. 1130, (Tex. 1912)
  • State v. De Silva 145 S.W. 330, (Tex. 1912)
  • Wells v. Driskell 145 S.W. 333, (Tex. 1912)
  • Ennis Water Works v. City of Ennis 144 S.W. 930, (Tex. 1912)
  • Wininger v. Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Co. 143 S.W. 1150, (Tex. 1912)
  • Stamford Compress Co. v. Ft. Worth National Bank 143 S.W. 1142, (Tex. 1912)
  • Lucas v. Lucas 143 S.W. 1153, (Tex. 1912)
  • Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Maxwell 143 S.W. 1147, (Tex. 1912)
  • Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. Gray 143 S.W. 606, (Tex. 1912)
  • Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. Cox 143 S.W. 606, (Tex. 1912)
  • Port Arthur Rice Milling Co. v. Beaumont Rice Mills 143 S.W. 926, (Tex. 1912)
  • Eppstein v. State of Texas 143 S.W. 144, (Tex. 1912)
  • Sabine Tram Co. v. Texarkana & Ft. Smith Railway Co. 143 S.W. 143, (Tex. 1912)
  • Keator v. Whittaker 143 S.W. 607, (Tex. 1912)
  • Hampshire v. Greeves 143 S.W. 147, (Tex. 1912)
  • Cooksey v. Jordan 143 S.W. 141, (Tex. 1912)
  • Wright v. Gale 143 S.W. 141, (Tex. 1912)
  • Hill v. Hoeldtke 142 S.W. 871, (Tex. 1912)
  • Graves v. Allert Fuess 142 S.W. 869, (Tex. 1912)
  • Sullivan-Sanford Lumber Co. v. Cooper 142 S.W. 1168, (Tex. 1912)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑