St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Earnest
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Earnest
296 S.W. 1088; 116 Tex. 565
(South Western Reporter)
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Earnest
Opinion of the Court
We think the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals (293 S. W. 677) was correct, because the motion filed in the trial court was manifestly insufficient to warrant the vacation of the judgment by default.
We are not prepared to concur in the holdings of the Court of Civil Appeals on the questions of practice discussed in the opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.