DIXIE GLASS CO., INC. v. Pollak
Cases that cite this one
27 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- John T. Measday v. Kwik-Kopy Corporation (5th Cir. 1983)
- Southwest Airlines Co. v. Jaeger (Tex. App. 1994)
- Chris Wilmot v. Harry A. Bouknight, Junior (Tex. App. 2015)
- Pinnacle Anesthesia Consultants, P.A. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. (Tex. App. 2012)
- Sun Medical, Inc. v. Overton (Tex. App. 1993)
- Maxwell v. Cardinal Petroleum Corp. (Tex. App. 1970)
- Beesley v. Hydrocarbon Separation, Inc. (Tex. App. 2012)
- Ponton v. Watson (Tex. App. 1985)
- Watts v. St. Mary's Hall, Inc. (Tex. App. 1983)
- Greater Fort Worth & Tarrant County Community Action Agency v. Mims (Tex. 1982)
- Carl M. Hadra v. Herman Blum Consulting Engineers, a Texas Corporation (5th Cir. 1980)
- Professional Services, Inc. v. Amaitis (Tex. App. 1979)
- Brock v. Mutual Reports, Inc. (D.C. 1979)
- La Marque Independent School District v. Thompson (Tex. App. 1979)
- SHESHUNOFF & CO., INC. v. Scholl (Tex. 1978)
- Sheshunoff & Co., Inc. v. Scholl (Tex. App. 1977)
- Miller v. A. & NR RAILROAD COMPANY (Tex. App. 1972)
- Mr. Eddie, Inc. v. Ginsberg (Tex. App. 1968)
- Texas Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. Allen (Tex. App. 1967)
- Dallas County Water Control & Improvement District No. 7 v. Ingram (Tex. App. 1965)
- Pan American College v. Rojas (Tex. App. 1965)
- Keating v. KCK CORPORATION (Tex. App. 1964)
- Bader Malallah v. Noble Logistic Services, Inc. F/K/A Dedicated Services, Inc. and SRS Texas Holdings, LLC (Tex. App. 2010)
- Church of God in Christ Jesus v. Griffin, 95-5806 (1998) (Superior Court of Rhode Island 1998)
- Woodford v. Benedict Community Health Center (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The Court of Civil Appeals has held that where an employer wrongfully breaches a contract of employment prior to the time it has been completely performed, the employee is not limited to damages accruing to the date of trial but may recover in one action his damages for the full term. 341 S.W. 2d 530. We approve this holding for the reasons stated by the Court of Civil Appeals in its opinion, although it is contrary 'to statements made in Lichtenstein v. Brooks, 75 Tex. 196, 12 S.W. 975; Niles v. Persons, Tex. Civ. App., 239 S.W. 2d 740 (no writ); Golden Rod Mills v. Green, Tex. Civ. App., 230 S.W. 1089 (wr. dis.); and Louisiana Rio Grande Canal Co. v. Quinn, Tex. Civ. App., 161 S.W. 375 (no writ). The points of error brought forward by the parties afford no basis for disturbing the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals reversing and remanding the cause for a new trial, and each application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.