Texas Power and Light Company v. Holder
Cases that cite this one
29 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Traxler v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. (Tex. 2012)
- Hughes Drilling Fluids, Inc. v. Eubanks (Tex. App. 1986)
- Cynthia Denise Ferguson Mosby v. Southwestern Electric Power Company (5th Cir. 1981)
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Smith (Tex. App. 1978)
- Becky Smith v. Gerald Brittain (Tex. App. 2020)
- Kyle Stawarczik v. Kenneth M. Weaver, NAC BCH Social Club, Inc., D/B/A Banita Creek Hall, Bamboozled, Inc., D/B/A Banita Creek Hall (Tex. App. 2012)
- McClure v. Rich (Tex. App. 2003)
- Wayne Poehls v. A. L. Turner (Tex. App. 2002)
- Wayne Poehls v. A. L. Turner (Tex. App. 2002)
- Richardson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Tex. App. 1998)
- Rodriguez v. Moerbe (Tex. App. 1998)
- Long Island Owner's Ass'n v. Davidson (Tex. App. 1998)
- Dabney v. Wexler-McCoy, Inc. (Tex. App. 1997)
- Silva v. Spohn Health System Corp. (Tex. App. 1997)
- Maguire v. Hilton Hotels Corp. (Haw. 1995)
- Peerenboom v. HSP Foods, Inc. (Tex. App. 1995)
- Clifford and Vickie Peerenboom, Individually and as Next Friends of Jo Ann Peerenboom, a Minor v. HSP Foods, Inc., D/B/A Jack in the Box (Tex. App. 1995)
- Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Gutierrez (Tex. App. 1990)
- Payne v. Vinson (Tex. App. 1988)
- City of Denton v. Page (Tex. App. 1985)
- Community Public Service Co. v. Baker (Tex. App. 1980)
- Wash v. Menn (Tex. App. 1979)
- R. L. Harris v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., Phillips Petroleum Co. (5th Cir. 1976)
- McDuff v. Howard (Tex. App. 1968)
- Long v. State (Tex. App. 1968)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
It is the opinion of the Court that the judgments of the trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals are correct. 385 S.W.2d 873. This action is not, however, to be taken as an approval of the dictum in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals that lines along a street or highway must be twenty-two feet above the ground. The application is refused, no reversible error. Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.