Cagle v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Cagle v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
389 S.W.2d 945
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cagle v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Opinion of the Court
We are not in accord with the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals that Clarence L. Cagle was judicially estopped by former inconsistent testimony. However, the trial court correctly granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and the Court of Civil Appeals properly affirmed the judgment. 386 S.W.2d 149. The application for a writ of error is therefore refused, no reversible error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.