Travelers Insurance Company v. Rose
Travelers Insurance Company v. Rose
392 S.W.2d 462
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Travelers Insurance Company v. Rose
Opinion of the Court
We refuse petitioner’s application for writ of error with the notation “no reversible error.” 389 S.W.2d 317.
The action taken, however, is not to be construed as approval of the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals that the lay witness Doyle Price was qualified to give opinion testimony to the effect that the respondent would not be able to hold a roughnecking job any more.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.