Scott v. Huntsville Independent School District
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Curadev Pharma PVT. LTD. and Curadev Pharma Limited v. the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dr. Xiaochen Bai, and Dr. Xuewu Zhang (Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District 2025)
- Mbp Corp. v. Bd. Trustees Galveston Wharves (Tex. App. 2009)
- MBP Corp. v. Board of Trustee of the Galveston Wharves And the Galveston Port Facilities Corporation (Tex. App. 2009)
- Riley v. City of Abilene (Tex. App. 1992)
- Brazos County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. Salvaggio (Tex. App. 1985)
- Urban Renewal Agency of San Antonio v. Abdo (Tex. App. 1978)
- City of Wichita Falls v. Gleghorn (Tex. App. 1975)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
On Motion for Rehearing of Application for Writ of Error
We have denied petitioners’ application for writ of error in this case on the ground that the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals presents no reversible error. 483 S. W.2d 344. The judgment of the trial court granting a permanent injunction against the School District and its Trustees from ever in the future seeking to condemn petitioners’ property conflicts with the right given to the State and its political subdivisions by Article 1, Section 17, of the Texas Constitution, Vernon’s Ann.St., to acquire property for public use. In their motion for rehearing, petitioners contend that Article 3265, Section 6, Vernon’s Texas Revised Civil Statutes Annotated, violates the Fourteenth Amendment, United States Constitution. This question will not arise until and unless the School District seeks to again condemn petitioners’ property and a proper plea raising the question is filed. In refusing petitioners’ application for a writ, we leave open the above questions for determination in a case when these issues are properly before us. Petitioners’ motion for rehearing is overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.