Tippett v. Brannon
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Cropper v. Caterpillar Tractor Co. (Tex. 1988)
- Dyson v. Olin Corp. (Tex. 1985)
- Bazzano v. Ware (Tex. App. 1975)
- International Business Machines Corporation v. Lufkin Industries, Inc. (Tex. 2019)
- International Business Machines Corp., Appellants/Cross-Appellees v. Lufkin Industries, Inc., Appellee/Cross-Appellant (Tex. App. 2019)
- Int'l Bus. Machs. Corp. v. Lufkin Indus., LLC (Tex. 2019)
- Cain v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1997)
- Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co. (Tex. 1981)
- Harmon v. Sohio Pipeline Co. (Tex. 1981)
- White v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1979)
- Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank of Lubbock (Tex. 1979)
- City of Ingleside v. Johnson (Tex. App. 1976)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Viewing the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals as a whole, its language in context, and its judgment that the catlse should be remanded for trial, it appears to us that the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals is that the findings of the jury are against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence. This conclusion is strengthened by the concurring opinion which states that the concurring justice wanted to make it clear that he did not join in passing upon the weight and preponderance questions. 485 S.W.2d 819 at page 823.
This Court does not have jurisdiction to pass upon the fact questions of the sufficiency of the evidence, or the great weight and preponderance of the evidence. We are of the opinion that there is some evidence to support the jury findings. It therefore follows that we cannot disturb the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and the Motion for Rehearing is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.