Womack Machine Supply Co. of Houston v. Fannin Bank
Cases that cite this one
31 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.
- GSL Welcome BP 32, LLC v. Harris County Appraisal District (Tex. App. 2010)
- Rios v. Northwestern Steel and Wire Co. (Tex. App. 1998)
- Painter Family Investments, Ltd. v. Underwriters at Lloyds (District Court, S.D. Texas 2011)
- Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care System (Tex. App. 2003)
- Wilkins, Robinetta v. Methodist Health Care System and the Methodist Hospital, Collectively D/B/A the Methodist Health Care System, Inc. (Tex. App. 2003)
- Pierson v. SMS Financial II, L.L.C. (Tex. App. 1998)
- Ealey v. Insurance Co. of North America (Tex. 1983)
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. General Insurance Corp. (Tex. App. 1974)
- American Bank, N.A. as Trustee of the Lisa Marie Buckley Trust and Co-Trustee of the John Buckley Jr. Trust and Kelly Rose Kinard Trust, John Buckley Jr. Trust, Lisa Marie Buckley Trust, Kelly Rose Kinard Trust, Together With John Buckley Jr., Lisa Marie Buckley, and Kelly Kinard, as Trustee, Co-Trustee and/or Trust Beneficiaries of the John Buckley Jr. Trust, Lisa Marie Buckley Trust and Kelly Rose Kinard Trust, and/or Shareholders v. Moorehead Oil & Gas, Inc., Moorehead Acquisition, LLC, and Moorehead Oil & Gas, LLC (Tex. App. 2018)
- Storguard Investments, LLC v. Harris County Appraisal District (Tex. App. 2012)
- Sunblik, Inc. v. Harris County Appraisal District (Tex. App. 2011)
- Grocers Supply Co. Inc. A/K/A Southwest Redevelopment v. Harris County Appraisal District (Tex. App. 2011)
- Covington Ex Rel. Lazard v. Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word (Tex. App. 2005)
- Elizabeth Roberts and Patricia Covington v. Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word, Houston, Texas (Tex. App. 2005)
- Elizabeth Roberts and Patricia Covington v. Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word, Houston, Texas (Tex. App. 2005)
- Elizabeth Roberts and Patricia Covington v. Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word, Houston, Texas (Tex. App. 2005)
- Maher v. Herrman (Tex. App. 2002)
- Sibley v. Sixth RMA Partners, L.P. (Tex. App. 2001)
- Thomas J. Sibley v. Sixth RMA Partners (Tex. App. 2001)
- Enserch Corp. v. Parker (Tex. 1990)
- Tatum v. Second Injury Trust Fund, State Industrial Accident Board (Tex. App. 1987)
- Mercure Co., NV v. Rowland (Tex. App. 1986)
- Grosberg v. Michigan National Bank Oakland (Mich. 1985)
- Texas A & M University at College Station ex rel. University of Texas System v. Ybarra (Tex. App. 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Womack Machine Supply Company of Houston brought this suit against Fannin Bank to recover sums paid on stolen checks. The trial court rendered judgment non obstante veredicto for Fannin Bank, and the Court of Civil Appeals reversed and rendered. 499 S.W.2d 917. Both parties have filed applications for writs of error.
Fannin Bank’s application for writ of error urges that the Court of Civil Appeals erred in holding that the statute of limitations was tolled by the filing of a suit in which the plaintiff Wom-ack was misnamed. We agree with the Court of Civil Appeals’ disposition of this question.
Womack’s application for writ of error seeks recovery of pre-judgment interest. The Court of Civil Appeals rendered judgment for Womack for $16,613.-21, the amount of those checks wrongfully cashed during the two-year period preceding the filing of Womack’s first original petition on March 25, 1970. The judgment made no provision for recovery of prejudgment interest. Womack is entitled to recover interest on the checks wrongfully cashed from the date each was cashed, but none earlier than March 25, 1968, until December 15, 1972, at the legal rate of 6%. Davidson v. Clearman, 391 S.W.2d 48 (Tex. 1965). Pursuant to Rule 483, Tex.R. Civ.P., upon granting the applications for writ of error and without hearing argument in the case, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and remand the cause to the trial court to render judgment in accordance with this opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.