Murray Savings Ass'n v. Zauber
Cases that cite this one
25 later published cases cite this decision. The 22 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Dunster Live, LLC v. Lonestar Logos Management Company, LLC Individually and D/B/A Lonestar Media Group Media Choice, LLC Curtis E. Ford Vincent Hazen Johnston Media, LLC Matthew C. Johnston And J. Andrew Cartwright (Tex. App. 2024)
- Somers Ex Rel. EGL, Inc. v. Crane (Tex. App. 2009)
- Webre v. Sneed (Tex. App. 2011)
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Norris (District Court, S.D. Texas 1993)
- Eye Site, Inc. v. Blackburn (Tex. 1990)
- Langston v. Eagle Publishing Co. (Tex. App. 1986)
- In re Umth General Services, L.P., Umt Holdings, L.P., Umth Land Development, L.P., Hollis M. Greenlaw, Todd F. Etter, Ben L. Wissink, and Cara D. Obert (Tex. 2025)
- In re Lonestar Logo & Signs, LLC (Tex. App. 2018)
- Lloyd P. Webre, Jr. Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Texas United Corporation and United Salt Corporation v. Robert Wayne Sneed, James H. Tichenor, Fred Wogel, and James F. O'Donnell, Texas United Corporation, United Salt Corporation (Tex. App. 2015)
- Sneed v. Webre (Tex. 2015)
- Equitec-Cole Roesler LLC v. McClanahan (District Court, S.D. Texas 2003)
- Christian v. ICG Telecom Canada, Inc. (Tex. App. 1999)
- Pace v. Jordan (Tex. App. 1999)
- DeBord v. Circle Y of Yoakum, Inc. (Tex. App. 1997)
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Brown (District Court, S.D. Texas 1992)
- Eckerdt v. Frostex Foods, Inc. (Tex. App. 1990)
- Thomas M. Gaubert v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board (D.C. Cir. 1988)
- Hajdik v. Wingate (Tex. App. 1988)
- Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Matthews (District Court, S.D. Texas 1986)
- Dodson v. Kung (Tex. App. 1986)
- Harry Lewis v. Al Knutson (5th Cir. 1983)
- Arnett v. Gerber Scientific, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error. In this derivative action the court of civil appeals reversed and remanded the judgment of the trial court which, upon granting the motion for summary judgment of the corporation, dismissed the suit without prejudice to refiling as an individual as opposed to a derivative action. 591 S.W.2d 932. The summary judgment proof of petitioner Murray Savings Association does not establish as a matter of law that the decision of its board of directors, taken after the suit was filed, to seek to have the case dismissed, constituted the exercise, in good faith and free from improper influence, of the sound business judgment of the board. Accordingly, we do not reach the question of whether such action so taken by the board, if established at trial, would bar the maintenance of this derivative suit even though respondent were to establish good cause for failing, prior to his filing the suit, to make efforts to have the corporation institute the action.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.