Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utility Commission
Cases that cite this one
42 later published cases cite this decision. The 22 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Antonio Arriaga and Inez Lara Rosales v. Obdulia Martinez Arriaga, Antonio Martinez Arriaga Jr., and Reyna Luisa Martinez Arriaga (Tex. App. 2015)
- Vista Medical Center Hospital v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company (Tex. App. 2013)
- Texas Department of Public Safety v. Story (Tex. App. 2003)
- City of Somerville v. Public Utility Commission (Tex. App. 1993)
- H. Tebbs, Inc. v. Silver Eagle Distributors, Inc. (Tex. App. 1990)
- Texas Ass'n of Long Distance Telephone Companies v. Public Utility Commission of Texas (Tex. App. 1990)
- Public Utility Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the Southwest (Tex. App. 1989)
- El Paso Electric Co. v. Public Utility Commission (Tex. App. 1987)
- Moran Utilities Co. v. Railroad Commission of Texas (Tex. App. 1985)
- McElvy v. Southwestern Correctional LLC (District Court, N.D. Texas 2021)
- Entergy Texas, Inc.// Office of Public Utility Counsel and Public Utility Commission of Texas v. Public Utility Commission of Texas and Texas Industrial Energy Consumers// Office of Public Utility Counsel and Entergy Texas, Inc. (Tex. App. 2015)
- Vista Medical Center Hospital v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company (Tex. App. 2013)
- Centerpoint Energy Entex v. Railroad Commission (Tex. App. 2006)
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Texas Department of Insurance (Tex. App. 2006)
- CenterPoint Energy Entex v. Railroad Commission of Texas, Victor Carrillo, Elizabeth A. Jones, Michael Williams, City of Tyler and State of Texas (Tex. App. 2006)
- CenterPoint Energy Entex v. Railroad Commission of Texas, Victor Carrillo, Elizabeth A. Jones, Michael Williams, City of Tyler and State of Texas (Tex. App. 2006)
- CenterPoint Energy Entex v. Railroad Commission of Texas, Victor Carrillo, Elizabeth A. Jones, Michael Williams, City of Tyler and State of Texas (Tex. App. 2006)
- CenterPoint Energy Entex v. Railroad Commission of Texas, Victor Carrillo, Elizabeth A. Jones, Michael Williams, City of Tyler and State of Texas (Tex. App. 2006)
- CenterPoint Energy Entex v. Railroad Commission of Texas, Victor Carrillo, Elizabeth A. Jones, Michael Williams, City of Tyler and State of Texas (Tex. App. 2006)
- CenterPoint Energy Entex v. Railroad Commission of Texas, Victor Carrillo, Elizabeth A. Jones, Michael Williams, City of Tyler and State of Texas (Tex. App. 2006)
- In re Barrett (Tex. App. 2004)
- in Re: David Barrett, M.D. (Tex. App. 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from the denial of a temporary injunction in a rate case. The court of civil appeals affirmed the denial of the temporary injunction. 615 S.W.2d 947.
The court of civil appeals correctly held that the applicant for a temporary injunction in a rate case must demonstrate: (1) that there is a reasonable probability that the utility will succeed on the merits of its claim, after final hearing; (2) that the loss to the utility will be irreparable; and (3) that the utility’s customers will be adequately protected by bond during the period of time the Commission’s order is suspended. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utility Commission, 571 S.W.2d 503, 506 (Tex. 1978); City of Houston v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 263 S.W,2d 169 (Tex.Civ.App.—Galveston 1953, writ ref’d). The purpose of the temporary injunction in rate cases is to protect the utility against confiscatory rates established by a regula
The court of civil appeals held that Southwestern Bell could not demonstrate irreparable harm because the rates could be adjusted retroactively if later determined to be confiscatory. We expressly reserve the question of the Commission’s ability to retroactively adjust rates under the Public Utility Regulatory Act, Texas Civil Statutes Annotated article 1446c, and the Administrative Procedures Act, Texas Civil Statutes Annotated article 6252-13a.
We agree that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the temporary injunction. The applications for writ of error are refused, no reversible error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.