Blackman v. Langford
Cases that cite this one
21 later published cases cite this decision. The 20 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Krishnan v. Sepulveda (Tex. 1995)
- Gross v. Davies (Tex. App. 1994)
- Sosebee v. Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center (Tex. App. 2000)
- Edinburg Hospital Authority v. Treviño (Tex. 1997)
- Booth v. Cathey (Tex. App. 1995)
- Fort Worth Osteopathic Hospital, Inc. v. Reese (Tex. 2004)
- Parvin v. Dean (Tex. App. 1999)
- Waltmon v. State (Tex. App. 2002)
- Brown v. Shwarts (Tex. 1998)
- Crites v. Pietila (Tex. App. 1992)
- Robert Eric Waltmon v. State of Texas (Tex. App. 2002)
- Krishnan v. Ramirez (Tex. App. 2001)
- Krishnan, Elizabeth, M.D. v. Ramirez, Senovio, Jr., Temporary Guardian of Property of Humberto Sepulveda, III, as Heir of Olga Ramirez Sepulveda (Tex. App. 2001)
- Crosby v. Glasscock Trucking Co., Inc. (S.C. 2000)
- Rupp v. Brown (Tex. App. 2000)
- Margie Rupp, Individually and on Behalf of Jacob Rupp v. Charles E.L. Brown, M.D. And Central Texas Perinatal Associates, P.A. (Tex. App. 2000)
- Margie Rupp, Individually and on Behalf of Jacob Rupp v. Charles E.L. Brown, M.D. And Central Texas Perinatal Associates, P.A. (Tex. App. 2000)
- Farley v. Sartin (W. Va. 1995)
- Naugle v. Theard (Tex. App. 1995)
- Pietila v. Crites (Tex. 1993)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
This cause once more presents the issue of whether a wrongful death and survival action can be brought when a viable fetus is subsequently stillborn. Tex.Rev.Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. §§ 71.002 & 71.021 (Vernon 1986). The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that the wrongful death and survival statutes do not permit a cause of action for the death of a fetus. The court of appeals construed the statutes as allowing a cause of action and therefore reversed the trial court’s judgment and remanded the cause for trial. 790 S.W.2d 127 (1990). We have held that “no cause of action may be maintained for the death of a fetus under the wrongful death statute until the right to bring such action is afforded by the legislature.” Witty v. American Gen. Capital Distrib., 727 S.W.2d 503, 506 (Tex. 1987); Tarrant County Dist. Hosp. v. Lobdell, 726 S.W.2d 23 (Tex. 1987) (per curiam).
The judgment of the court of appeals conflicts with prior decisions of this Court. Pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 170, we grant petitioners’ application for writ of error and without hearing oral argument a majority of the Court reverses the judgment of the court of appeals and affirms the judgment of the trial court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.