Harbison-Fisher Manufacturing Co. v. Mohawk Data Sciences Corp.
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Murray v. EPIC ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. (Tex. App. 2009)
- Cantu v. Howard S. Grossman, P.A. (Tex. App. 2008)
- Mahmood Chaseekhalili and Fatema Faiyaz v. Cinemacar Leasing, Inc. (Tex. App. 2012)
- Mahmood Chaseekhalili and Fatema Faiyaz v. Cinemacar Leasing, Inc. (Tex. App. 2012)
- in Re Patrick W. Murray, Jr. (Tex. App. 2009)
- Mark A. Cantu v. Howard S. Grossman, P.A. (Tex. App. 2008)
- Urso v. Lyon Financial Services, Inc. (Tex. App. 2002)
- Urso, Richard, M.D. v. Lyon Financial Services, Inc. (Tex. App. 2002)
- Houston Cable TV, Inc. v. Inwood West Civic Ass'n (Tex. 1993)
- Public Citizen v. Third Court of Appeals (Tex. 1993)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS, having considered the Unopposed Motion to Grant Application for Writ of Error and Enter Order Reversing and Rendering Judgment filed herein on June 19, 1992, together with First Amendment to said Unopposed Motion filed herein on July 22, 1992, is of the opinion that said unopposed motion, as amended, should be, and hereby is, granted in part. Petitioner’s unopposed motion to allow amendment of application for writ of error is granted. Petitioner’s amended application for writ of error is granted without reference to the merits. Petitioner’s fourth motion for extension of time to file application for writ of error pursuant to Rule 130(d), Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, is dismissed as moot.
The judgments of the court of appeals, 823 S.W.2d 679, and the trial court are set aside without reference to the merits, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for *384 further proceedings in accordance with the settlement agreement of the parties.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.