Texas Supreme Court, 1992

Howell v. Thompson

Howell v. Thompson
Texas Supreme Court · Decided October 21, 1992
839 S.W.2d 92; 36 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 100; 1992 Tex. LEXIS 134; 1992 WL 296966 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Howell v. Thompson

Cases that cite this one

46 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

The court of appeals’ issuance of its opinion and judgment was void because it occurred after petitioner filed bankruptcy proceedings and during the pendency of the automatic stay provided by 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1). Continental Casing Corp. v. Samedan Oil Corp., 751 S.W.2d 499, 501 (Tex. 1988). It is therefore ordered that petitioner’s application for writ of error is granted, the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion. Tex.R.App.P. 170. This order does not preclude reis-suance of the same opinion and judgment.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.