Texas Supreme Court, 1992

Credit Motors, Inc. v. Hogan

Texas Supreme Court · Decided October 28, 1992

841 S.W.2d 360; 36 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 125; 1992 Tex. LEXIS 140; 1992 WL 310013 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Mayfield v. Peek (Tex. App. 2017)
Petro Express, LTD., William Bobbora, Richard Stinson, and James Jongebloed v. Horkey Oil Company, Inc. (Tex. App. 2005)
Petro Express, LTD., William Bobbora, Richard Stinson, and James Jongebloed v. Horkey Oil Company, Inc. (Tex. App. 2005)
Petro Express, LTD., William Bobbora, Richard Stinson, and James Jongebloed v. Horkey Oil Company, Inc. (Tex. App. 2005)
Boone v. LeGalley (Tex. App. 2000)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In this lease dispute, two employees of Credit Motors, Inc. were identified by name in Michael Hogan’s answers to interrogatories as persons having knowledge of relevant facts. Because their addresses and phone numbers were omitted, the trial court refused to permit Hogan to call them as witnesses. Tex.R.Civ.P. 215, subd. 5. The court of appeals reversed. 827 S.W.2d 392.

In denying the application for writ of error, we are not to be construed as ap*361proving or disapproving the court of appeals’ reliance on TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. 1991), in determining whether the trial court properly excluded the testimony of these witnesses.

The application for writ of error is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.