Briones v. Solomon
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision. The 2 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Williams v. Bell (Tex. App. 2013)
- Hunt v. Baldwin (Tex. App. 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
A demand for postjudgment interest arises from the judicial process rather than directly from a commercial or consumer transaction, and is therefore not a “charging” under the usury laws. George A. Fuller Co. v. Carpet Services, Inc., 823 S.W.2d 603, 605 (Tex. 1992). The court of appeals rendered the correct judgment because respondent presented the point that there was no charging of usurious interest. We neither approve nor disapprove any portion of the court of appeals opinion. 805 S.W.2d 916. Petitioner’s motion for rehearing is overruled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.